 |
| Would you pair this with Cherry Coke? |
“Beautiful music,” said Luther, “is one of the most
magnificent and delightful presents God has given us.” Polarized as we are in the church over what music qualifies as beautiful, I do wonder what Luther would have to say after
he had a good listen to some of our sung worship today.
In the last fifty years church music has undergone a radical
metamorphosis. While most Christians applaud these unprecedented changes, I sometimes feel like many efforts to blend the timeless truths of the gospel of
Jesus Christ with pop music modeled after the entertainment industry work
about as well as pairing Cherry Coke with filet mignon.
Not surprisingly, in response to the tendency of worship
leaders to prefer music composed in the last fifty years, there are those who
want to recover the beauty of what is often termed classical music. I have the
highest regard for composers of great music like Bach and Beethoven, Mendelssohn
and Mahler (and Luther); my music collection is full, among other things, with
their music. I would love to see another generation of God’s people develop a
renewed appreciation of the splendor and beauty of music that strikes the chord
of eternity in worship (regardless of genre). But I wonder if our zeal to bring
this about at times consumes our wisdom.
GAZING ON THE MUSIC
In my church experiences over the years, I have found myself jolted out of meditation
on the Living God in worship by a liturgy feature that worries me. While I attempt to
take the words of the silent prayer to heart—“Turn my heart to you, O Lord.”—I
am deftly steered clear of that by a prominent text identifying the music being
played, “Prelude in B-flat major, Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy (1809-1847).” To
be blunt, it strikes me as intrusively academic and, dare I say it, elitist, to
be confronted with this information so prominently. While attempting to quiet
my heart before the Lord in preparation for worship, I am diverted by details straight
from the syllabus of a music appreciation course.
Furthermore, I wonder how it strikes an unbelieving visitor.
There’s already plenty of high register elements surrounding an unbeliever in
Christian worship, and then we club him with this wholly unnecessary one. Whereas the
music itself might have helped lift him above the ordinary and commonplace, the
labeling in the bulletin creates a Berlin Wall, one that in all likelihood
will appear to be a snub. “We are a sophisticated church of elite music snobs,”
the labeling appears to be saying. “You’re welcome here if you become one too.”
HIGH-BROW MEDITATIONS
For believer or unbeliever, the placarding of the music and
composer has shifted us from high thoughts of God to high-brow thoughts of Western
art music. The prominent music labeling in the bulletin reminds me of the
derailing distraction that happens in a liturgy where worshipers are pointed to
a sculpture or painting of Jesus instead of to JESUS himself. So in this case,
art enshrined on a pedestal inadvertently trumps the true Object of worship.
The prominence of the music and the composer is made still
more preeminent by what is sometimes left out. Oddly, in some bulletins we do
not identify the author of the poetry in the hymns—Newton or Cowper, Watts or
Wesley—yet we contort ourselves placarding the music and composer. Oddly, as I prepare to sing, “Take my life
and let it be / Consecrated Lord to thee,” I am confronted with the important
fact that Franz Liszt who was born in 1811 and who died in 1886 wrote the music
Consolation being now played by the
musician (while poet Francis Havergal’s name is never mentioned).
WORDS COME FIRST
But what’s so wrong with drawing attention to the music and
the composer? After all, in the opening pages of Genesis (4:21) it says that
“Jubal was the father of all who play the lyre and pipe.” And we learn about
the Sons of Korah and their important role as musicians and composers of music
for worship. And don’t some Psalms lead off telling us the actual name of the
tune, for example, “Doe of the Dawn” (22)? What’s the problem? It’s all right
there in the Bible?
The problem is precisely because it isn’t all right there in
the Bible, not in the way it is in some of our printed worship guides.
In the Bible the music is only very rarely identified in the inspired liturgy
of the Psalms. While the vast majority of the Psalms identify the poet
who, under Divine Inspiration, wrote the poetry of the Psalm, very few of the
150 Psalms identify the name of the tune, and fewer still identify the musical
composer. What's more, the smartest OT scholar on the planet does not have a clue what "Doe of the Dawn" sounded like; as much as me may wish they had, not a riff from an original Psalm tune has survived--but ever jot and tittle of the words of 150 Psalms has.
Why are the Psalms so frequently attributed to the poets but
so seldom to the musicians? Likely it is because Christianity is all about the
Word of God, revealed to us in a book filled with words, including the most
glorious poetry ever penned. While “…music is one of the most magnificent and delightful
presents God has given us,” and ought to have a central place in Christian
worship, the Bible and Christian worship is first and last all about the words.
The way some of our worship guides identify music and text,
however, one would think it were the reverse. Music comes first, the words come
after. I don’t believe this is our priority in worship, but simply looking at the
order of service in some bulletins on a Sunday morning and it feels like this: “Turn
my heart to the Sonata quasi una Fantasia
Op 27. No. 2, O Lord, and turn me to Ludwig van Beethoven, and to his birth
year in 1770 and to the year of his death in 1827, O Lord.” When we do this, our
zeal to recover classical music has become the Cherry Coke of the metaphor.
THE SOLUTION
In the interest of doing everything we do in word and deed as
we sing Psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs in the name of Jesus (Colossians
3:16-17), a Christ-centered liturgy would do well to include neither the composer’s
name nor the poet’s name in the progression through the printed guide to worship.
Let’s stop thinking of our printed liturgy as a polemic on
our theology of worship in which we showcase our sophisticated classical music
taste. If we do choose to identify artists, we would do well to be Psalm-like
in our priority, never subordinating poetry and poet to musical composition and
composer. The simplest solution? Identify hymn writers and composers in
footnotes at the end of the bulletin—back page, small print, after the
announcements and notifications. Soli Deo gloria!
Posts
